1. ‘being’ being ‘Being’ establishes a metaphysical system
2. ‘being’ exist
3. being - action, Process/reality – exists
4. ‘Being’ exists
5. ‘being’ exists ‘within’ being - action, Process/reality
6. being – action, Process/reality exists ‘within’ ‘Being’
7. ‘being’ ‘within’ being – action, Process/reality exists ‘within’ ‘Being’

Abstract:
The following is the general flow the metaphysical system (‘being’ being ‘Being’) takes when examined against the most generally accepted concepts held by today's sciences, religions or philosophies.

‘’being’s Relationship to ‘Being’

1. ‘being’, individuality, exists
2. Process/reality exists
3. ‘being’, individuality exists ‘within’ Process/reality
4. Process/reality exists ‘within’ ‘Being’
5. ‘being’ exists ‘within’ ‘Being’

Knowledge:

1. Process/reality – action, being exists
2. Individuality, ‘being’ exists
3. Summation, totality, ‘Being’ exists

In this metaphysical system, there is a perceived ‘outside’ to ‘being’, there is a perceived ‘outside’ to being – action Process/reality, but there is no perceived ‘outside’ to ‘Being’.

This metaphysical system provides no alternative to ‘being’s’ location. ‘being’ is ‘inside’ ‘Being’ for there is ‘nowhere’ else to be, to go, to be sent.

As the metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being’) unfolds, it leads ‘being’ to the understanding of ‘Being’ being the ‘creator’ of ‘being’.

‘Union’ ‘within’ the metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being’) provides the understanding regarding the significance of ‘being’.

‘being’s’ significance:

1. ‘being’ exists ‘within’ Process/reality
2. ‘being’ exists ‘within’ ‘Being’
3. ‘being’ perceives itself as a ‘critical aspect of ‘Being’, totality, summation for totality cannot be totality without all its parts
4. ‘being's’ perception of itself whether as a combination of many ‘beings’ or as individuality determines its action
5. The level of significance ‘being’ places upon itself, defines the parameters of its action towards itself as well as towards other ‘beings’
6. ‘being’ perceiving itself as a part, a portion of ‘Being’, perceives itself as ‘significant’
7. ‘being’ perceiving other ‘beings’ as a part, a portion of ‘Being’, perceives others as significant
8. ‘Within’ this metaphysical system, ‘being’ perceives itself, perceives other ‘beings’, being ‘significant’ to ‘Being’ itself

‘Within’ this metaphysical system, ‘being’s’ ultimate goal is accept its ‘potential significance’ as it, ‘being’, perceives it to be on an individual bases. As such, ‘being’ strives to fulfill that potential in its own unique, individualistic manner.

‘Within’ this metaphysical system, ‘being’s’ ultimate goal is to accept the ‘potential significance’ of other ‘beings’ on an individual bases. As such, ‘being’ strives to fulfill that potential through the action of granting the individual their own unique individuality, granting the individual their own unique uniqueness.

The significance of ‘being’ now becomes defined.

‘being’s’ defined significance: strive to reach its own unique potential in its own unique manner.

Social Ramifications:

1. The essence of all ‘being’ is ‘Being’
2. ‘being’ exists ‘within’ being – action, Process/reality
3. ‘being’ has ‘significance’
4. ‘being’ through being – action, Process/reality understands that it has potential ‘significance’, meaning, importance to ‘Being’
5. There is no higher directive than to pursue one’s ‘significance’, meaning
6. ‘Being’ generates being – action, Process/reality; which generates ‘being'
7. ‘being’ generates being – action, Process/reality which generates ‘Being
8. Philosophical label: Abstract Hedonism
9. The metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being’) provides the logic needed to prioritize all action ‘within’ being – action, Process/reality.

The metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being’) establishes the rationale for the elimination of status levels between ‘beings’ themselves. The lack of a hierarchical status system between ‘being’ and ‘Being’ provides the rationale for the elimination of all hierarchical systems ‘within’ being – action, Procdess/reality.

Through the metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being’), we form an understanding regarding the interrelationship between ‘being’ – what is and being – action, Process/reality as well as the interrelationship between ‘being’s’ being and ‘Being’. Under the metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being’), it is the responsibility of ‘being’ to take control of its own individual potential significance and to fully develop such potential significance. Under the metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being’) it is understood, all ‘beings’ are to control their own potential significance for no ‘being’ is able to understand another ‘being’s potential significance better than that ‘being’ itself.

We can begin to understand this metaphysical system by examining how ‘being’ perceives ‘Being’. As such it will help to examine three characteristics such a metaphysical system could generate from the perspective of ‘being’ as it functions ‘within’ being – action, Process/reality and ‘Being’.

Omniscience:
The metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being’) assigns a ‘location’ ‘within’ which the summation of knowledge is confined. It is confined ‘within’ the totality of ‘Being’, the ‘creator’ of Process/reality, the ‘creator’ of ‘being’.

Omnipotence:
The metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being) implies a ‘location’ ‘within’ which the summation of power is confined. It is confined ‘within’ the totality of ‘Being, the ‘creator’ of Process/reality, the ‘creator’ of ‘being’. .

Omnipresence:
The metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being’) implies a ‘location’ ‘within’ which the summation of ‘location’ itself, ‘within’ which being – action, Process/reality, is confined. Process/reality, being –action is confined ‘within’ ‘Being’.

The metaphysical system of ‘being’ being ‘Being’ establishes the ultimate form of significance to ‘being’. Within such a system, ‘being’ becomes a part of ‘Being’ and in fact adds to ‘Being’s’ being.

Impact:
‘being’ being ‘Being’, defines the location of ‘being’, ‘being’ is ‘inside’. The location of ‘being’ is seemingly insignificant, but the subtlety initiations enormous perceptual and behavioral actions ‘within’ Process/reality.

Process/reality, action, being:
At this point in time, there are two options to consider.

Option 1: Process/reality itself is different from everything within it and has no origination. Thus Process/reality had nor ‘originator’. Process/reality has always existed.

The premise that Process/reality had no beginning, had no creative originating force is supported by nothing we have observed before - no observations and no logic. Is the concept of Process/reality having no beginning an option to consider? Certainly it is an option to consider.’ But the question is not: Is the option of ‘it always was’ an option to consider but rather is it the most logical option.

Option 2: All things within Process/reality appear to have an identifiable beginning, therefore Process/reality, action, being itself must have an identifiable beginning and thus, an originator.

The significance of whether option 1 or whether option 2 is correct loses it importance within the metaphysical system of ‘being’ being ‘Being’. Rather, significance finds its own significance in the relationship that exists between both ‘being’, the noun, and ‘Being’, the noun, through being, the verb, action, Process/reality itself.

The metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being’) provides a well-structured understanding as to the rational interrelationships between ‘beings’, to the rational interrelationships between ‘being’ and its own ‘being’, and to the rational interrelationships between ‘being’ and ‘being’s’ environment:

The Metaphysical System of (‘being’ being ‘Being’) Establishes:

Regarding ‘Being’:
In essence, ‘Being becomes the focus.

Regarding ‘being’:
In essence, ‘being’ becomes the focus.

Regarding being:
In essence, being – action, Process/reality becomes the means.

‘Attainment’ emerges out of a perception of ‘potential significance’ for both ‘being’ as well as ‘Being’. ‘Comparisons of one to another’, ‘relative values’ of one to the other, lose their perceived significance through metaphysical system of ‘union’ as opposed to the metaphysical system of ‘separation’.

Growth, equilibrium, decay are three choices for both the state of ‘being’ and the state of ‘Being’.

The rational choice this metaphysical system establishes for ‘being’ is growth for being – action, Process/reality ‘within’ which ‘being’ is ‘located provides a means by which ‘being’ can do just that, grow.

The rational choice this metaphysical system establishes for ‘Being’ is growth for being – action, Process/reality which is located ‘within’ ‘Being’ provides a means by which ‘Being’ can do just that, grow.

Permanent equilibrium cannot be found ‘within’ such a metaphysical system.

Decay cannot be found ‘within’ such a metaphysical system.

Where then is growth understood to be? With the understanding of ‘Being’s’ omnipresence, omnipotence, and omniscience, growth is change and change is generated by ‘being’s’ being within ‘Being’s’ being.

Whether growth is a positive or negative action is relative and up to ‘being’ itself. Does growth become directed, influenced by ‘Being’? That is not the question of metaphysics that is the question of religion, of Ontology.

‘being’s’ being – action is a part of Process/reality, is ‘within’, is a part of ‘Being’ and as such affects ‘Being’ through being – action, Process/reality. Likewise ‘Being’ containing being – action ‘within’ which ‘being’ can be found affects ‘being’ through being – action, Process/reality.

With the concept of ‘being’ being ‘inside’ Process/reality there emerges the rationality for respect due ‘Being’ by ‘being’ and a respect due ‘being’ by ‘Being’. The ‘whole’ cannot be ‘a’ whole without all its parts and ‘a’ part cannot be ‘a’ part without the existence of ‘a’ whole

‘being’ being ‘Being’, rationalizes a non-hierarchical system existing between ‘Being’ and ‘being’. ‘being’ being ‘Being’ creates the impetus to establish social systems void of hierarchical concepts.

‘Being’ becomes defined as the whole as omnipresent. ‘being’ existing within Process/reality, is identified with Process/reality, with what lies ‘inside’ ‘Being’, omnipresence. Thus, ‘being’, through location, takes on the perception of having significance to ‘Being’. Simultaneously ‘Being’, through location, takes on the perception of having significance to ‘being’. being – action, Process reality becomes the intermediary, the means by which the mutual significance is processed.

‘being’ takes on the perception of being a part, while ‘Being’ takes on the perception of being all present – omnipresent, all knowing – omniscient, and all powerful – omnipotent.

Within such a metaphysical system, ‘being’ ‘affects’ ‘Being’ and ‘being’ understands its ability to do so. ‘Being’ evolves from the very fact that it, ‘being’, exists ‘within’ Process/reality.

Along with ‘being;s’ realization of the reasonableness regarding its ability to ‘affect’ ‘Being’ comes the realization of the reasonableness that the part of Process/reality ‘within’ which ‘being’ exists, most likely did not ‘create’ itself. Spontaneous generation does not correspond to the observed laws of Process/reality.

As such, within the metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being’) ‘being’ looks to ‘Being’ as the ‘creator’ of Process/reality. This generates the concept of ‘Being’ possessing the capacity for action, ‘Being’s’ being. So it is through the metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being’), an understanding of ‘being’ being one of possibly many means of being ‘Being’, naturally evolves into the metaphysical system of ‘being’ being ‘Being’.

(‘being’ being ‘Being’) offers the understanding of ‘being’ being significant to ‘Being’. It offers the understanding of the concept of eternal, timeless existence. It offers the understanding that all ‘beings’ will experience timelessness should they ‘exit’ being for there is ‘nowhere’ else to go should one leave being – action, Process/reality than into ‘Being’ itself.

As such, ‘being’, has one responsibility: to fully develop one’s potential significance as best one is potentially able, as best one, as best ‘being’ sees their own individual potential to be rather than as developing it as ‘others’, other ‘beings’ see it to be.

Understanding responsibilities as defined by significance through being – action, Process/reality which is ‘within’ ‘Being’, initiates respect for ‘beings’ between ‘beings’, initiates respect for ‘being’ towards itself, and initiates respect for ‘beings’ toward their home, the environment, Process/reality. Within the metaphysical model of (‘being’ being ‘Being’), the annihilation of ‘being’s’ being – action, Process/reality mechanism, does not destroys ‘being’ but rather simply destroys the temporary, the concept of existence immersed ‘within’ time, the home of ‘being’, Process/reality itself. Within a metaphysical perception of (‘being’ being ‘Being’), the annihilation of Process/reality would destroy no action, ‘accomplishments, of ‘beings’, for future action exists ‘within’ Process/reality, but past actions are not ‘to be’ but rather ‘are’. Past actions are actions already taken, they exist as nouns rather than verbs. Without Process/reality, action – being, future actions may not occur but what actions have occurred are no longer in the Process of becoming for they already are. As such past actions have moved from being – action, Process/reality into being a part of ‘Being’ itself.

Is the metaphysical system of (‘being’ being ‘Being’) a complete system? Yes, is completed through the process of union, which in this particular system is absent paradoxes.

Under the Metaphysical System of (‘being’ being ‘Being’):

1. ‘being’ generates being – action, Process/reality
2. being – action, Process/reality generates ‘Being’
3. ‘Being’ generates being – action, Process/reality
4. being – action, Process/reality generates ‘being’
5. There is no higher directive than to maximize one’s own potential significance as one sees it rather than as others see it

Regarding ‘being’:
‘being’s, individuality’s, main directive is abstract hedonism: to exist for ‘being’s’ self as well as for ‘Being’s self.

Regarding ‘Being’:
‘Being’s , main directive is free will: to exist for ‘Being’s’ self as well as for ‘being’s’ self.

Type of System:
A Cartesian metaphysical system located 'within' a non-Cartesian metaphysical system.

A non-Cartesian system 'powered' by a Cartesian system.